Protecting Biodiversity in Manufacturing
Biodiversity
Biodiversity and nature provide all of the essential
ecosystem services, including clean water resources,
pollination activities, disease control, soil formation,
climate regulation, cultural contributions and much
more, that underpin the majority of global industries
and supply chains today.
Loss of these ecosystem services is projected to cost the global economy over $2.7 trillion by 2030. Recognising this, the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity adopted the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) in 2021, prompting organisations worldwide to better understand and measure the interconnected impacts of business and nature.
Metrics will be required for current and future regulatory compliance and reporting purposes. However we also see a need for actionable insights that business users unfamiliar with ecology or ecosystem services resilience planning can use to develop tangible interventions.
When negative impacts are identified, business users need clear recommendations and NGIS has been focused on building a platform to provide this. There are a number of key capability challenges that companies face with implementing biodiversity monitoring and reporting systems including:
- Being able to directly address the requirements of leading global risk frameworks
- Analysing future sourcing risk, based on biodiversity metrics
- Accessing downscaled geospatial biodiversity data
Google, NGIS and Second Nature Ecology + Design are working together to enable Google to address key sustainability ambitions for its first-party hardware devices by implementing a new approach to the modelling of biodiversity impact, dependencies and risks in
electronics supply chains through the TraceMark™ sustainable sourcing platform.
With a specific focus on aligning to key frameworks, this project operationalises a range of leading biodiversity frameworks including Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), Science Based Target Network (SBTN), EU Taxonomy Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) Criteria and the Global Biodiversity Framework. TraceMark™, powered by Google technology can be used to model 100+ datasets to deliver metrics that address key biodiversity requirements and targets aligned to leading frameworks. The resulting capability bridges the gap between goals and commitments and the frameworks required for reporting.
A data-driven approach for global risk analysis
The aim is to reduce operational complexity for implementing key biodiversity frameworks, accelerating the ability to set, monitor and meet commitments and regulations across the consumer sectors. A Geospatial Data Driven approach for global risk analysis that delivers improved accuracy with scoring. By using detailed spatial datasets, organisations are able to move beyond simple spreadsheets to analyse specific risks, leveraging complex spatial data. The geospatial approach to biodiversity risk modelling and analysis is aimed at helping organisations meet reporting requirements and make informed decisions by:
- Prioritising Mitigation Actions: By comparing impact and risk scores across different locations, organisations can focus interventions where they will have the greatest benefit, whether by reducing harm or strengthening resilience.
- Optimising Resource Allocation: Companies can allocate resources (e.g., habitat restoration or sustainable sourcing initiatives) to sites with the highest impact-to-risk ratio.
- Ensuring Regulatory and Compliance Readiness: Understanding spatial variations in risk helps businesses anticipate policy changes and ensure compliance with evolving environmental regulations in different jurisdictions.
- Improving Supply Chain Transparency: Multi-site comparisons help identify high-risk suppliers or regions, supporting strategic decision-making for procurement and operational adjustments.
- Enhancing Stakeholder Engagement: Transparent comparisons allow investors, regulators, and local communities to assess corporate sustainability performance, fostering trust and accountability.
The resulting evolution of the TraceMark™ platform provides a pathway to preserving biodiversity in manufacturing supply chains. Future improvements will focus on several key capabilities to enhance and strengthen TraceMark™ ’s ability to support businesses in assessing and mitigating biodiversity risks.
Want to explore more articles like this one? Download our 2024 Impact Report
Related Articles
Here are more related articles you may be interested in.
Future Proofing Cities for Climate Resilience
Smart Cities What causes strain on urban infrastructure around the globe? The increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, driven by climate change, have placed significantstrain on urban infrastructure globally. From prolonged heatwaves and fires to intense storm systems, these disruptions are impacting network resilience causingwidespread damage, severe flooding and traffic chaos on our…Neurodiversity in the Workplace
At NGIS, diversity and inclusion are part of the DNA, which shows in the makeup of the workforce. 6.5% of the team identify as First Nations peoples, 42% of the workforce are female, which is 60% above the industry average, and 42% of the team are under the age of 35. Together, these figures reflect…Digitally Transforming Supply Chains in the Coffee Industry
With the implementation of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) coupled with impacts of climate change there is a need to provide fundamental digital capability to ensure that African farmers are both able to participate in global supply chains as well as being resilient to climate change.Sustainable Palm Oil
Around 90% of oil palm trees globally are located in Malaysia and Indonesia, islands with the most biodiverse tropical forests in the world. Because palm oil requires up to nine times less land than other vegetable oil crops, its efficient use of land makes palm oil extremely attractive to producers and purchasers across the world.
